When ECOSOC communicates for and on Europe
By Vané on Monday, November 19 2007, 18:12 - Communication - Permalink
This post is also available in: Spanish ItalianWhat is ECOSOC? In the Brussels Euroxpat language it stands for the European Economic and Social Committee, a consultative body where European representatives of civil society, trade unions and employers share a platform to put forward opinions on decisions made by the European Commission, the European Council or the European Parliament.
On 12th Nov ECOSOC organised a one day seminar on "Communicating Europe: what role does civil society wish to play?" which gathered around 150 communicators from across Europe.
Daniel Feher (Dialog 09) and I moderated a workshop on "How to better reach the European Public? The Role of the Internet in communicating and consulting civil society organisations". I always enjoy these types of events because 1. you meet new people 2. you share ideas. The objective of the workshop was to find ways to improve communication towards European citizens and provide communication channels for European citizens to use when seeking to connect with EU Institutions. The web 2.0 can open these channels (let's not get into the whole debate of whether 2.0 is for real or not
). And given the fact that ECOSOC works directly with civil society, it has a key role to play in making them available.
This was the idea Daniel and I tried to convey during our seminar. I was surprised to see, however, the general skepticism
towards the blogosphere: what legitimacy does it have? How can we control the information? Does it really have the power to influence? I thought it was even quite difficult to stick to 2.0 topics at times.
Nonetheless, some valuable examples were given such as, the "Our Europe- Our Debate - Our Contribution", which published videos of people randomly interviewed about Europe, or the Interactive Ideas blog animated by a young Greek participant. For some, like Willy de Backer, former chief Editor of Euractiv, blogging on environmental issues is now part of his daily professional activities (see 3E Intelligence). In the end, we all agreed that new media tools should be used to provide information in all languages and gather consultations for civil society. "How" remains to be determined. What's important is that communicators continue to share their ideas. Beacause as Yochai Benkler says, there's no point in trying to analyse too much "popular tools of communication", since "these will undoubtebly be supplented by new ones". This is why Daniel and I have created a facebook group called "Communicating Europe", a group to share ideas and best practices- so feel free to join.
In fact, should the new Treaty of Lisbon be ratified, civil society will have its word to say so figuring out how is extremely relevant. During the morning session, one of the participants suggested the idea of launching a "European Civil Society" wiki tool, based on the wikipedia model (see also Adriano's eurogeneration article on "Inside Wikipedia and more"). One of the panelists suggested to create a sense of European belonging with simple means: first day of school under a Greek theme or a Spanish day at the canteen. And why not see the Erasmus programme extended to apprentice students and teaching bodies?
I'm fairly convinced that many of these brilliant ideas had already found a fertile ground at MEP Gérard Onesta's "Citizens' Agora" organised the week before at the European Parliament and which was mentioned here and there throughout the day. But the best place for inspiration remains in cafés (hence café
babel... get it? :-). After an intense day of listening, brainstorming, networking and communicating (!), a nice drink with Mrs Jillian Van Tournhout, Vice-President of ECOSOC (and former business woman who converted 2 years ago to the non-profit sector), her team and other participants gave new impetus to our common objectives.
Photo credit: EESC/ Vanessa Witkowski
Comments
Well
First questions:
What do you expect from an active european citizen ?
Without speaking about civic rights, what is an active european citizenship ?
how the EC could develop such citizenship ?
Involvment in civil society for citizens, how do you define that ?
How can you measure the effectivness of a active european citizenship.
Communicating Europe ? What do we want to communicate ? That there is EU institutions, Europeans right, or making people aware about an eventual common european culture, based on values, .....
Thank you for your answers
Hello Vanessa,
It was very nice to meet you indeed.
The skepticism expressed by some high-profile participants potentially shows the distance that still exsits between new technologies and the Brussels Eurocrats.
A distance, however, that does not apply to the society as a whole. I would argue that the civil society is able and ready to respond to online initiatives, as evidenced by the example of the massive discussion that took place in the blog of Commissioner Stavros Dimas during the recent Blog Action Day. Even more importantly, the majority of the comments came by Greek people (the Commissioner being Greek himself), when Greece is perhaps the last country in the EU in terms of ADSL penetration and e-democracy.
In my view, when and if the knowledge and political barriers fall, the European institutions will be able to take advantage of a large variety of Web 2.0 tools that will enable Europe to come closer to its citizens, notably at the individual and the local level.
However, it would be nonsensical to jump into the bandwagon of Web 2.0 without careful planning and selection of channels. Second Life and social networking may sound cool but does Europe really need to have a presence there? I guess it would be much more relevant to work on a human face of Brussels, either through officials' blogs and podcasts or through fora such as the Agora that you mentioned.
PS. Some of the links in the post are broken!
Hi JM,
By European active citizenry, I mean the ability for European citizens to participate and influence the European public agenda via voting, campaigns, platforms of debates online or in cafés on issues that concern all Europeans.
We must therefore first provide information so that Europeans can take an active role ("en connaissance de cause", as we would say in French)- that's what communicating Europe is about.
Once we've established platforms for European citizens, such as the cafebabel.com community, we'll be able to see to what extent they influence the European decision-making process. And with the Treaty of Lisbon, civil society will have a better chance to get involved. It's now a question of learning how to use these tools effectively.
Does that answer your questions?
Vanessa
Hi Alexandros! I updated the links (again- thanks for letting me know). I hope it works this time.
Mmhhh... your perspective is very wise. I'm more of a "goer". I'd like to see as many MEPs as possible on Second Life or the babel community (see for ex: http://second-life-fresh-news.blogs... (thanks Monika for this interesting link!)).
For me, Europe is already on the 2.0 waggon. But I deeply agree with you that we should not undermine people-2-people events. 2.0 is simply is an added-value. I see it with our network of volunteers. It's very important that they meet each other in person, otherwise the incentive to participate in a mere virtual community becomes obsolete.
See you soon for coffee!